A counteroffer may seem tempting – it’s supposed to be. The point is to address whatever concerns
led
you to want to leave, whether that’s pay or something else, and the fact your employer is willing to
take these steps to retain you can make you feel more valued than you did before. But don’t let
yourself
be flattered into taking the counteroffer without thinking carefully about the pros and cons.
Companies have a host of reasons for issuing counteroffers – and not all of them are about your
performance as an employee. Sometimes employers are worried about staff retention levels, or losing
employees’ knowledge to competitors; some managers worry that a team member’s resignation would
reflect
badly on their management abilities or make the team harder to manage; and, usually, a counteroffer
means the company understands it would cost more to recruit and train a replacement. These potential
factors mean it’s risky to assume that the counteroffer means your contribution is truly valued and
being recognised – you should try to take a more dispassionate, objective view of the situation to
ensure the counteroffer is being presented for the right reasons for you.
If you’re examining the counteroffer objectively, this is when you should ask “why weren’t these
issues
addressed before now?”. If you asked for a pay rise, only to be told the money wasn’t available, why
is
it available now? If you were told it was impossible for you to work remotely more often, why is it
suddenly possible? The answers to these questions should inform your decision. But the fact you were
motivated to find, apply for, and interview for another job suggests you had legitimate reasons for
leaving, which probably can’t be invalidated by an improved offer.